Yesp StudioYesp Studio
Case study
TechnologyManaged ITKubernetes

Confidential · SME SaaS

Zero incident regressions at 7× scale and flat infrastructure spend.

Engagement at a glance
Timeline
Ongoing
Team
1 SRE lead · 2 SREs · 1 platform engineer
Industry
Technology
ROI
MTTR reduced 70%, infra cost flat.
Engagement summary

The platform needed to scale event volumes by 7× without a hiring spike.

Engagement overview

Context, scope, and success criteria

The SaaS business was growing quickly, and event volume was increasing faster than the team could add people. Reliability issues were starting to appear in edge cases, and the founders needed a way to scale without turning every growth spurt into an incident response exercise.

Project snapshot
Timeline
Ongoing
Team
1 SRE lead · 2 SREs · 1 platform engineer
Industry
Technology
Primary stack
Kubernetes cloud native
Objectives
  • Scale throughput without increasing major incidents or introducing brittle workarounds.
  • Improve incident response and recovery speed so the team could focus on product work again.
  • Keep infrastructure spend stable during growth and avoid a runaway platform cost curve.
  • Give the engineering team a more predictable release and support model.
Challenge

Why the work started

The platform needed to scale event volumes by 7× without a hiring spike.

Solution

What we built

Platform engineering plus 24/7 SRE with progressive delivery and incident automation.

Event scale
70%
MTTR reduction
0
Sev-1 regressions
Architecture

Legacy versus modern flow

Platform structure
Legacy state

A growing event-driven platform with insufficient guardrails, inconsistent incident procedures, and too much manual intervention during spikes.

Modern stack

A Kubernetes platform with progressive delivery, SLO-driven operations, and automated reliability workflows that scale with demand.

Delivery

How the work was executed

01

Implemented progressive delivery and reliability guardrails around the Kubernetes platform.

02

Defined SLOs, error budgets, and ownership runbooks tied to alerting and release control.

03

Automated high-frequency operational interventions such as restarts, scaling actions, and common rollback paths.

04

Created on-call playbooks that reduced the friction of handing off incidents.

Governance

Controls and delivery rhythm

Reliability governance combined weekly SRE reviews with product engineering leadership alignment, ensuring the growth roadmap and platform risk stayed in the same conversation.

The platform sustained significant volume growth while maintaining reliability and cost control, and the engineering team could absorb more traffic without adding operational chaos.

Outcome

Results and next steps

Business outcome
MTTR reduced 70%, infra cost flat.

Zero incident regressions at 7× scale and flat infrastructure spend.

Next phase

The roadmap includes deeper platform self-healing, improved developer productivity automation, and stronger cost attribution for teams.

Have similar architecture bottlenecks?

We can map the same modernization pattern to your infrastructure, release process, and operating model.